Export controls · United States

ITAR & EAR,
held to the line.

Posture assessment, Internal Compliance Programme build, and end-user / end-use due diligence for US-headquartered defence and dual-use suppliers, and for non-US suppliers with US-touching transactions.

288 FT United States Capitol · east front NEOCLASSICAL · CAST-IRON DOME · 1866
DS-2032 Filed
DDTC · Registration
Statement of Registration
22 CFR § 122 · Annual renewal · ICP cross-reference
2 regimes
ITAR · EAR · with OFAC overlay
3 engagements
Diagnostic · Build · Per-transaction
7 ICP elements
BIS / DDTC-recognised structure
6 gates
From intake to handover
§ A — Position

A bounded role,
by design.

The boundary protects the client and keeps the work durable under regulator scrutiny. State it. Hold to it.

— 01

Assess the system

Whether the Internal Compliance Programme you have, or do not yet have, would withstand a regulator visit, a prime contractor audit or a licence renewal. Scored across the seven ICP elements.

  • Regime applicability mapped
  • ICP maturity grid populated
  • Findings prioritised by exposure
— 02

Build the programme

Where findings are material, or where there is no programme at all, we build the ICP. Policies, procedures, screening protocols, training, recordkeeping, audit framework, handover to the designated officer.

  • Procedure set drafted to operation
  • Empowered Official designation supported
  • Handover demonstrated at G6
— 03

Diligence the transaction

For specific shipments, the management-system due diligence. Red Flag analysis per BIS Know Your Customer guidance, restricted-party screening, diversion risk, evidence pack for the file.

  • BIS / DDTC list set + sanctions overlay
  • Red Flag matrix per KYC guidance
  • Decision record signed by client
— 04

Stay current

Programmes decay. Counterparty risk shifts. Lists update. Where the work continues past first build, a quarterly governance retainer keeps the programme current and the screening cadence live.

  • Quarterly refresh cycle
  • Change-controlled procedure updates
  • Annual ICP audit report
§ B — Engagements

Three engagement
types.

Each runs through the six-gate quality system from intake to handover. Final scope, sequencing and fee are set at engagement letter.

§ C — Regimes

The frameworks
we work to.

The US export-controls surface and the cyber-assurance regimes that travel alongside it. Drafted within. Not certified, not represented.

ITAR 22 CFR Parts 120–130

International Traffic in Arms Regulations. Defense articles, defense services and technical data on the US Munitions List. Registration, licensing, recordkeeping, the deemed-export rule, the brokering regime. Where ITAR applies, the ICP scope expands accordingly.

EAR 15 CFR Parts 730–774

Export Administration Regulations. Dual-use items classified by Export Control Classification Number, plus end-user / end-use controls including the catch-all under EAR §744. ICP must show classification discipline, screening discipline and recordkeeping discipline.

OFAC programmes 31 CFR Chapter V

Country, list-based and sectoral sanctions administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control. SDN List, sectoral programmes, secondary sanctions exposure. Travels alongside ITAR and EAR in every transaction-level due diligence.

DFARS & cyber DFARS 252.204-7012 · NIST SP 800-171 · CMMC 2.0

For DoD suppliers, the cyber regime that travels with the contract. Covered Defense Information handling, incident reporting, the maturity expectations under CMMC 2.0. Drafted within the ICP where the contract surface requires it.

FCPA & IEEPA 15 USC 78dd · 50 USC 1701

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Anti-bribery controls and emergency sanctions authority both surface in counterparty diligence and in the programme's books-and-records obligations.

§ D — Dual exposure

When UK suppliers
touch US controls.

Most defence-sector transactions land in more than one regime. The ICP is built to recognise this, not to ignore it.

— Case 01

UK supplier into a US prime

A UK-incorporated supplier wins a flow-down contract to a US prime contractor. The goods, services or technical data may be subject to ITAR or EAR on the US side, the UK Export Control Order on the UK side, and DFARS cyber expectations under the prime's flow-down clauses.

The ICP must hold both regimes simultaneously: a single management system, two regulator audiences, one consistent set of records.

Route · UK base programme + ITAR / EAR overlay + DFARS cyber rider
— Case 02

US-headquartered supplier via UK subsidiary

A US-headquartered defence supplier operates a UK subsidiary. The subsidiary is subject to UK export controls; the parent remains accountable for ITAR re-export and re-transfer obligations on any US-origin content.

The ICP at subsidiary level must operate UK rules natively while remaining auditable from the US compliance function and consistent with parent-level ITAR registration.

Route · UK programme · consistent with parent ITAR programme · reconciled in audit trail

Where exposure is genuinely dual, the diagnostic (C-07) is scoped to both regimes from the outset. The programme build (C-08) produces one set of artefacts that hold under either audience. The per-transaction work (I-07) screens against both list sets in a single pass. See also ECJU & OFSI for the UK and EU framings.

§ E — Fit

Best applied
when.

Honest indicators that this work is the right step right now.

A prime is asking

A prime contractor has issued a supplier questionnaire on export controls or cyber, and the answers cannot honestly be given today.

A licence is due

A DDTC registration is due for renewal, or an active licence is up for re-application, and the supporting programme needs to look the part.

A transaction is live

A specific shipment, sale or technical-data transfer is on the table, and the end-user / end-use needs to be diligenced before it ships.

§ Next step

Tell us
where it sits.

The regime, the trigger, the timeframe. We'll come back with a scoped C-07, C-08 or I-07 and the boundary written plain.

Send the situation — 24h response